Search results for query: *

Would explain a lot. I mean why do the .177 and .22 seem so much more efficient? Don't get me wrong.... not too concerned about the .25 shot count... I think energy is fine and accuracy is lights out. For hunting... it's Ok..... maybe that was the thought process?

.177 Data.

Just did the .177 I'm going to call it 70 shots in one fill. Will post data tonight.

I will be posting my results for the .177 later today. I'm also just getting the hang of using the Caldwell G2. So the first few strings with the .177 had a lot of misses. I don't even have a scope on the .177 yet. So no info on accuracy. But the .25 is pellet on pellet at 30 yards.

Why'd you drop the Bobcat? Curious. I own one currently and love it on a bench...otherwise it's BULKY. If I were to get another .30 it would probably be a Daystate Wolverine .303

So yeah...I'm admittedly drawn to the looks of the Huntsman. That's why I own one in .25 and .177...(and in the market for a 22.) I have always loved the looks of the Huntsman... but that Kral man... dollar for dollar.. how can you complain. :)

Hey Rob.. I did follow this filling procedure.

Yeah. You could call it 17 if you stretched it. Not sure how Daystate gets the 20 shots it states the brochure. Still, for the hunting I do it's more than enough. I've got the .177 Revere as well.. will be posting those results soon.

I've seen some conflicting data around how many shots you can get with the Huntsman .25 Caliber. Decided to post my Chronograph results here. Chronograph Used: Caldwell G2