Search results for query: *

STO doesn't have a patent from what I can find on their site (but plenty of proof of prior art). This seems like a marketing hijack to me. If they decide to go after STO for trademark or patent infringement however... I know what brand not to support.

Couldn't wait 😁

Hopefully time tomorrow to do the install. Beautiful piece of work.

Hehe, so do they. You can see a piece of pink foam between the gun and the car in the first pic :)

If I remember correctly they are just a text file in some kind of CSV format, so open and edit with notepad. I would bet excel messes up the formatting when saving it. Any technical questions on file format or what certain things mean you'll have to reach out to Igor over Facebook.

That is wildly impressive. What gun are you shooting? And how do those N50 circles compare to standard benchrest cards?

IN

Yep just send an email. They have info on their product pages for bulk orders. Based on my last purchase, the savings tops out around 2000-2500 rounds, which is the weight limit they can package and ship in one box. At that point you're getting the bulk discount and maximizing your shipping cost.

Bin, the owner of The Pellet Shop, he was shooting a production version RP.

He wasn't shooting the same gun in finals though. IIRC his gun broke the night before finals and he was shooting Bin's production gun instead. I don't know more than that, except it didn't even have a cheek piece. Bin shot a 235 in his second relay with that gun. Wind for finals was definitely...

Can you link to where you contacted them / purchased the foreend / rail? The full chassis is nice but I'm concerned about the added height from the air tube.

I have some logistics questions if anyone has answers: 1) What distances are available for site-in? Would be great to have past 100, but a 50 yd zero is important for the PRS shooters. 2) Will a site-in be available / allowed before the PSC event (day of), or do we have to rely on Wednesday's...

I'd love to hear your results and where you landed on speed.

Turned out to be windy at the range today. That's good and bad for testing... not great for groups, but good for seeing variance. I'll be focusing on the 50s for NAC. Here was my best 5 shot group of the day, 845 fps, managed to catch some consistent wind for a bit.

I shot the 50s and 45s over the weekend, getting ready for NAC. They have a very similar design to the JTS, but are not the same. They are a bit longer (AEA 45s to JTS 45s). I've also heard the lead composition might be different, but I can neither confirm nor deny. I'm using a different barrel...

I shoot with Adam up at Trenier throughout the summer, really good guy. They posed some challenges. With the right barrel and tune you are correct, they can produce some great results.

Very cool visualization. I think you can use much shorter rings on the DRS Pro and still fit the magazine due to the height of the rail. That might improve its dimensions.

I meant that the scope height and the rail angle don't matter to the displayed holdovers. It should match the table. However @AJT might have a point .. if it's set to SFP then the holdover will change with magnification.

Everyone (almost) is missing the point... the holdover in the scope has nothing to do with the real world except for the LRF ranged yardage. You could hold it in your hand and it should read the same. I have this scope and verified today correct range vs reticle holdovers out to 106 yds from my...

I knew I was going to catch some heat for my take :) I don't want to belabor it after Zan's thoughtful reply. Suffice to say, it was my interpretation of a product introduced to address very specific issues, ie production, tail and cross wind stability.