Reply To: FX Radar



Nice work trying to compare the devices.  I can't see that a duplicate reading necessarily indicates less accuracy.  It certainly might but it also could be that the shots were actually duplicates.  It seems that to compare how the change in position effects the readings you should move both devices each time.  Inconvenient for the larger unit but that is the advantage of the smaller device.  If moving the Caldwell produced similar changes in readings then that would seem to strengthen the utility of the FX. 

If the FX proves to be too position sensitive for shooters to easily get reliable readings then it's usefullness would seem to be greatly lessened.  I did note that the video Giles posted about the FX did mention exactly this issue, that some of his guns needed different positions for good readings with some "below the muzzle" and others back from the muzzle.

  • This reply was modified 1 year ago by bandg.