• Please consider adding your "Event" to the Calendar located on our Home page!

Field Target is an arms race.

On scopes.....

Just ran some numbers from the most recent match I attended, the AZ State match.

31 shooters in various classes for the main event (rifle).

First is a copy and past for the scope column from the match report:

View attachment 592566

Next is a quick little spread sheet I put together. The values are of course in dollars. The order is the same as the list above. Had to estimate prices on some of those, most of which with a google AI query. Some of the prices were from Amazon, others were common airgun retailers. So these are going rates, as much as possible, not MSRP.

View attachment 592567

So the 31 shooters spent anywhere from $200 to $3500 bucks on just their scope. And that $3500 might not be the true max, as the specs for the March werent listed.

The average price spent on a scope at this match was just shy of $1200.

The 31 competitors collectively spent a total of just short of $37k on their scopes.

And no, the most expensive scopes weren't always the winners. Luckily the arms race isn't that cut and dry. Through out this all I've held that field target is an arms race. Which is not the same thing as saying the person who spends the most is the highest scoring shooter.

I could do the same for the guns...I'm fairly certain the total is gonna be much higher than 37k. In other words, those 31 shooters were using over $100,000 worth of guns/scopes/etc.

FIELD. TARGET. IS. AN. ARMS. RACE.
For humors sake:
BUT.IT.DOESN'T.HAVE.TO.BE.
 
I see your aging eyes, and I raise you my ophthalmic condition: keratoconus.

You'd be blown away if I explained my daily process of what I have to do to be able to see. Without the scleral lenses, I'm legally blind. In short, the scleral's require pulling them out of my eyeballs with a little toilet plunger device. And I've got to that every couple hrs, all day long, because they get progressively more cloudy the second I put them back in. Each time requiring rinsing them with specical fluids, and then filling them with a different special fluid prior to replacing them in my eyeballs. The first, second, and sometimes third replacement attempt usually result in bubbles, leaving a blind spot where the bubble is, as well as a prism effect. So each replacement turns into a 10-15minute process, until I get them placed correctly. They're larger diameter than an American quarter. That's not to mention the special fittings required to make me a new pair about once a year. They're essentially opthalmic prosthetics.

And one of the haul mark symptoms of keratoconus is very poor vision in low light conditions. Yes, it's fun.

We are all playing with some variety of impediment. Making drastic changes to cater to one or another individuals particular impediment is a slippery slope.
But - the slippery slope doesn’t have to be soooo slippery. Let’s say a match director just has to have “his“ dark targets in dark lanes….. ok…. but….
Let’s now ask that match director to be reasonable and consider his players / clubs true needs by appropriately limiting the overall number of difficult targets …
after-all what is a match directors’ goal? Would their pride be hurt by some shooters enjoying higher scores? Is a shoot off that then incorporates dark targets in dark areas a bad thing???

It’s easy to prevent someone from cleaning a course… but is that our goal?

IMO, what’s truly difficult is encouraging more and more people to show up and then leave - but - excited to return and bring a friend.

link for educational purposes:
 
My first real scope for FT was a Nikko 10-50x. Great scope, nothing wrong with it at all, it is my backup scope currently. I bought a Sightron SIII because of the reticle (its wider/more marks out to the right and left sides and is illuminated). I have not used the illumination since I purchased it...

I've thought about a March 80x but it has heat shift issues and is dark at 80x. Thought about a Khales but what would I really gain by spending $4k over what I have currently? Better glass? Distance ranging is not an issue, I could use some additional light in the tube (34mm would be a good start) but will I like the smaller top mounted wheel? Am I going to drop 4k to just experiment, nope. What about a S6, heard the ranging is odd, the reticle is nice though...

Until I can find something physically wrong with the Sightron i'm having a difficult time justifying a replacement and i've just figured out I can use it effectively on 12x and 16x...
I have owned all of those pricey scopes mentioned And more!
At 16X …. I say Meh…why bother?
I’m fortunate that I have both healthy eyes and the moolah to play with a variety of Airgun toys.
But owning (expensive stuff) ? well, that’s not my “point of discussion“ or my long term goal for Hft.
We have within our grasp, the ability to make HFT enjoyable to a much wider audience. All that’s required is some forethought.
where
when
and
why
is it necessary to place a dark target, or numerous dark targets, in dark areas?
This and this alone, is my single biggest point!
Challenging courses can still be set with great variety while maximizing the joy factor For ALL hands.
I for one don’t care if I ever clear a course or win anything - other than a good time and some new friends. But I DO care about being able to actually see the KZ so I can apply my marksmanship skills against it.
AND
I don’t want to be imagining the frustration the shooter squadded with me is feeling because their scope is also incapable of acquiring the KZ.
 
I have owned all of those pricey scopes mentioned And more!
At 16X …. I say Meh…why bother?
I’m fortunate that I have both healthy eyes and the moolah to play with a variety of Airgun toys.
But owning (expensive stuff) ? well, that’s not my “point of discussion“ or my long term goal for Hft.
We have within our grasp, the ability to make HFT enjoyable to a much wider audience. All that’s required is some forethought.
where
when
and
why
is it necessary to place a dark target, or numerous dark targets, in dark areas?
This and this alone, is my single biggest point!
Challenging courses can still be set with great variety while maximizing the joy factor For ALL hands.
I for one don’t care if I ever clear a course or win anything - other than a good time and some new friends. But I DO care about being able to actually see the KZ so I can apply my marksmanship skills against it.
AND
I don’t want to be imagining the frustration the shooter squadded with me is feeling because their scope is also incapable of acquiring the KZ.
Regarding the 36T AAFTA thing for Grand Prixs - smaller KZ’s at further distances is also doable with bright faceplates!
 
These are my thoughts on the subject of scopes, which closely mimic my thoughts on rifles, and my overall take on this whole competitive shooting topic.

There is no denying that "better" glass is more readily available, the shear number of new manufacturers from when I first got involved in shooting is staggering, when USO seemingly took the market by storm with their one or two offerings. Before that Leupold LR series and Nightforces's NSX were considered the standard, not because they were optically superior to the Zeiss, Khales and S&Bs but because they struck a balance, great glass for the price and often with "more desirable features" like higher mag, "tactical" turrets and more travel due to the then revolutionary 30mm tube offerings, not to mention the bigger and bigger Objective Bells, but even then, those features all together were only found on a few models and at certain price points.

Nowadays, that cluster of most desirable features has become the norm, and dozens upon dozens of companies offer them. Obviously, price point remains the pivotal differentiator; "Quality" has been and will remain a by product of the R&D, engineering, manufacturing, raw materials, assembly, and QC procedures. Your criteria and pocket book determine the necesary quality you need and can bare to stomach. Nonetheless, I'd venture to say a good number of the available products out there indeed deliver "good bang for the buck" and in most cases, surpass what was available before. Field Target, like the earlier years of Long Range, F class, style shooting, IS a scope-centric shooting sport/discipline/activity. That to me is an indisputable fact.

The part that makes Field Target its own game worthy of playing it, is the fact that it is an "unknown" distance scenario, and the only way to estimate range is through the use of a feature meant to do something else, to remove Parallax. No scope manufacturer that I am aware of has ever ventured to market side focus as a ranging feature, simply because it is not. Since FT is a close range proposition and optical requirements for close viewing dictate specific calibrations, the Parallax feature is exploited to serve as a method of ranging. Though often marked with presets of estimated yardage, no one of sound mind relies on those numbers or even the perception of focus against those numbers, individual verifications is key.

Also as scopes get better at optical clarity, they also ask the operator be better. The "snappiness" we often talk about and require from scopes is rapidly becoming muddled due to that same bump in that same optical clarity. Who here hasn't struggled with an HD, ED, glassed scope, and has had to become even more discerning in their ranging routine or skills? Where my fuzzy Nikkos lacked optical clarity, they shined at more definitavely letting me know that yes, it's fuzzy, but that its where it is at. Now I gotta look at high definition image and ascertain whether I'm seeing it at 1080p, HD, or 4k resolution. Yes, I can see the proverbial gnats ass, but I have to focus on its droppings to somewhat guess range.. And the operative word emerges, SKILL. The shooter must hone his skills with his choice of equipment. A highly skilled shooter with decent equipment will outperform the guy who buys upward in hopes to compensate. Is it possible to make things easier with money, certainly. Certain levels of accuracy can be guaranteed if we pay the folks who make a living out of making such guarantees or your money back. This, however, is not really the case when it comes to rifle scopes, as the Parallax/focus is not a dedicated rangefinder, nor is it marketed as such. The operator must make it one specific to his/her needs. That entails time and the cognitive abilities that help reason through all the ambient variables in order to arrive at unique to you calibrated ranging scale. This is the point where the warriors separate themselves from the rest of the indians, the dedication to arrive at the best possible outcome for every aspect of their platform and their techniques.

Hence, most other disciplines have moved away from estimating range aided by scope features. The early days of LR involved making reticle calculations via the reticle design at a preset magnification power on the scope. The development of reliable, affordable, feature-rich laser rangefinders has relegated the capability of rangefinding with the scope to a backup skill that few bother to learn, even if their scope reticle supports it, as the need for some mathematical skill is required, so a good number of shooters take advantage of a ballistic calculator in standalone or app forms on their phones. Buying capability works for their chosen activity, not so much for us in FT.

Now, as to the claim that Field Target is a hunting simulation, the only game currently adhering to that notion, and that most closely resembles a hunting scenario, is European HFT. Since actual Hunting is mostly done with lower magnification scopes (3-9X, maybe 10X) and their rules reflect this by capping magnification at 12X, not 16X. Therefore, their scope propositions are of the actual variety marketed as hunting scopes. The rangefinding is still mostly done by bracketing the target with the aid of the reticle, and the drop compensation by holdover. Very much as in actual hunting scenarios where there is litttle to no time to make mechanical adjustments. But the similarities to real-world hunting end there, just as you ready your mat to take a prone shot, something not often seen in small-game close-quarters hunting, unless we are simulating hunting from a static hide, which in it of itself is also more akin to some European small game hunting.

So to me, the insistence to justify or tie the activity of Field Target to anything other than as a shooting discipline or activity unique to itself is a highly unnecessary one. And in the case of overseas folks, more of an inclination to tie it back to ancestral or Sportmanship Endevors, in the hopes of making the activity more palatable to certain groups...

To presume we are attempting to acquire quarry, and then track its movement through a high magnification optic, would defeat the pinnacle skill of being a hunter, which is Stalking. No wild animal would miss the wildly swinging contraption attempting to be aimed at it. Let alone be so aloof as to not scatter as we approach in groups, loudly rambling, and while we further ask of it to valiantly wait as we walk up to within yards of it and prepare $10k plus worth of equipment and perform all manner of girations within spitting distance of it. Few things are more removed from the actual act of hunting, I dare say.

On the subject of recruitment into Field Target and the implied decline in numbers. TO ME, Field Target numbers are perceived to be low in comparison, again, to the Brits. This is mostly due to geographical presets; our country is vast, and the region we know as the UK fits 2.8 times in Texas. That alone is a reliable indicator of how proximity can play a role in having higher participation numbers. The existing clubs are in closer proximity, therefore requiring fewer resources to foment a more cohesive interested group. The distance to the home club is 4-5 hours round trip, depending on the day, with the next nearest club being closer to 12 hours away round trip. Distance is the number one factor that prohibits me from participating more, with MONEY being the next. Though I have had the pleasure of owning dozens of very high end rifles and optics, I still have to account for the expense that an all out travelling commitment would incur. The resource requirement factor, the high cost of entry and the high cost of travel in order to participate in a competitive fashion will deter the vast majority. For those that are lucky enough to not be hindered by those factors, TROYER will.. Few will justify spending tens of thousands of dollars to feel inadequate. For the sensible ones, their needs will be met at the club/backyard level with equipment they deem sensible as well..
 
Last edited:
I
Thru the years scopes have improved mostly in the ranging department. With some good ones being discontinued. About the only way I see for the sole race war to stop. Would be a marked distance or the use of rangefinders. Im sure that won't happen but there would be more new shooters able to compete.
Rangefinders can be tricky with the targets we use, are they less tricky than scope ranging at 12 or 16x?

There is no rule against posting the target distances and KZ sizes at the shooter's box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Motorhead
I

Rangefinders can be tricky with the targets we use, are they less tricky than scope ranging at 12 or 16x?

There is no rule against posting the target distances and KZ sizes at the shooter's box.
Now that brings up a very interesting question to ask those who play the game and those who limit them self's or don't play due to similar reasons .. ??????

I don't have the ability of my scope to parrilax range to the required to know distance.
I can't range well due to the limits of magnification in the Hunter class's
I don't really understand how to get accurate D.O.P.E. for my set up used to play the FT game etc etc etc .....

So if MD posts at each lane ACTUAL DISTANCE, then states KZ size there shooting at .... the first two gripes get pretty much covered IMO.
As to the third .... simply have folks during practice home or pre-match shoot at random known distances within 10-55 yards and have them write down whats the required correction ... With a MD posting distance to target, shoot it as in practice !!!! The size of the KZ tells you how sloppy of a job trying to get in the hole you can be :LOL:

NOW ... done as such, MANY of the reasons folks don't wish to invest in time or equipment in no longer an excuse. As the overall skills of the shooters increase, make the KZ's smaller or further away ... HIGHER TROYER value :oops:

The SKILL required does not change as technique, consistent shot set up, reading wind and having an accurate gun and pellet combo is STILL the task of any shooter to figure out !!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JW.
Well there is a chance for one more gripe with posted distances, in XFT the distances are posted but most competitors do their own ranging and typically come up with something different than what is posted.

I've made 3' square flat panels for Nevada, I either put the panel in the box and range from the proposed target location to the box (in the case of moving shooting boxes I put a panel at each box to set the two targets) or have someone go out with the 3' panel and stand at the target pole to get the 'near' exact distances (from the shooting line to the target), obviously if you scooch back a yard you'll see different numbers (typically the barrel is supposed to cross the line).

I've been temped to discreetly post this info at the box, i'd have to make some different lane markers to do this but its been a thing i've been thinking about for a few years.
 
These are my thoughts on the subject of scopes, which closely mimic my thoughts on rifles, and my overall take on this whole competitive shooting topic.

There is no denying that "better" glass is more readily available, the shear number of new manufacturers from when I first got involved in shooting is staggering, when USO seemingly took the market by storm with their one or two offerings. Before that Leupold LR series and Nightforces's NSX were considered the standard, not because they were optically superior to the Zeiss, Khales and S&Bs but because they struck a balance, great glass for the price and often with "more desirable features" like higher mag, "tactical" turrets and more travel due to the then revolutionary 30mm tube offerings, not to mention the bigger and bigger Objective Bells, but even then, those features all together were only found on a few models and at certain price points.

Nowadays, that cluster of most desirable features has become the norm, and dozens upon dozens of companies offer them. Obviously, price point remains the pivotal differentiator; "Quality" has been and will remain a by product of the R&D, engineering, manufacturing, raw materials, assembly, and QC procedures. Your criteria and pocket book determine the necesary quality you need and can bare to stomach. Nonetheless, I'd venture to say a good number of the available products out there indeed deliver "good bang for the buck" and in most cases, surpass what was available before. Field Target, like the earlier years of Long Range, F class, style shooting, IS a scope-centric shooting sport/discipline/activity. That to me is an indisputable fact.

The part that makes Field Target its own game worthy of playing it, is the fact that it is an "unknown" distance scenario, and the only way to estimate range is through the use of a feature meant to do something else, to remove Parallax. No scope manufacturer that I am aware of has ever ventured to market side focus as a ranging feature, simply because it is not. Since FT is a close range proposition and optical requirements for close viewing dictate specific calibrations, the Parallax feature is exploited to serve as a method of ranging. Though often marked with presets of estimated yardage, no one of sound mind relies on those numbers or even the perception of focus against those numbers, individual verifications is key.

Also as scopes get better at optical clarity, they also ask the operator be better. The "snappiness" we often talk about and require from scopes is rapidly becoming muddled due to that same bump in that same optical clarity. Who here hasn't struggled with an HD, ED, glassed scope, and has had to become even more discerning in their ranging routine or skills? Where my fuzzy Nikkos lacked optical clarity, they shined at more definitavely letting me know that yes, it's fuzzy, but that its where it is at. Now I gotta look at high definition image and ascertain whether I'm seeing it at 1080p, HD, or 4k resolution. Yes, I can see the proverbial gnats ass, but I have to focus on its droppings to somewhat guess range.. And the operative word emerges, SKILL. The shooter must hone his skills with his choice of equipment. A highly skilled shooter with decent equipment will outperform the guy who buys upward in hopes to compensate. Is it possible to make things easier with money, certainly. Certain levels of accuracy can be guaranteed if we pay the folks who make a living out of making such guarantees or your money back. This, however, is not really the case when it comes to rifle scopes, as the Parallax/focus is not a dedicated rangefinder, nor is it marketed as such. The operator must make it one specific to his/her needs. That entails time and the cognitive abilities that help reason through all the ambient variables in order to arrive at unique to you calibrated ranging scale. This is the point where the warriors separate themselves from the rest of the indians, the dedication to arrive at the best possible outcome for every aspect of their platform and their techniques.

Hence, most other disciplines have moved away from estimating range aided by scope features. The early days of LR involved making reticle calculations via the reticle design at a preset magnification power on the scope. The development of reliable, affordable, feature-rich laser rangefinders has relegated the capability of rangefinding with the scope to a backup skill that few bother to learn, even if their scope reticle supports it, as the need for some mathematical skill is required, so a good number of shooters take advantage of a ballistic calculator in standalone or app forms on their phones. Buying capability works for their chosen activity, not so much for us in FT.

Now, as to the claim that Field Target is a hunting simulation, the only game currently adhering to that notion, and that most closely resembles a hunting scenario, is European HFT. Since actual Hunting is mostly done with lower magnification scopes (3-9X, maybe 10X) and their rules reflect this by capping magnification at 12X, not 16X. Therefore, their scope propositions are of the actual variety marketed as hunting scopes. The rangefinding is still mostly done by bracketing the target with the aid of the reticle, and the drop compensation by holdover. Very much as in actual hunting scenarios where there is litttle to no time to make mechanical adjustments. But the similarities to real-world hunting end there, just as you ready your mat to take a prone shot, something not often seen in small-game close-quarters hunting, unless we are simulating hunting from a static hide, which in it of itself is also more akin to some European small game hunting.

So to me, the insistence to justify or tie the activity of Field Target to anything other than as a shooting discipline or activity unique to itself is a highly unnecessary one. And in the case of overseas folks, more of an inclination to tie it back to ancestral or Sportmanship Endevors, in the hopes of making the activity more palatable to certain groups...

To presume we are attempting to acquire quarry, and then track its movement through a high magnification optic, would defeat the pinnacle skill of being a hunter, which is Stalking. No wild animal would miss the wildly swinging contraption attempting to be aimed at it. Let alone be so aloof as to not scatter as we approach in groups, loudly rambling, and while we further ask of it to valiantly wait as we walk up to within yards of it and prepare $10k plus worth of equipment and perform all manner of girations within spitting distance of it. Few things are more removed from the actual act of hunting, I dare say.

On the subject of recruitment into Field Target and the implied decline in numbers. TO ME, Field Target numbers are perceived to be low in comparison, again, to the Brits. This is mostly due to geographical presets; our country is vast, and the region we know as the UK fits 2.8 times in Texas. That alone is a reliable indicator of how proximity can play a role in having higher participation numbers. The existing clubs are in closer proximity, therefore requiring fewer resources to foment a more cohesive interested group. The distance to the home club is 4-5 hours round trip, depending on the day, with the next nearest club being closer to 12 hours away round trip. Distance is the number one factor that prohibits me from participating more, with MONEY being the next. Though I have had the pleasure of owning dozens of very high end rifles and optics, I still have to account for the expense that an all out travelling commitment would incur. The resource requirement factor, the high cost of entry and the high cost of travel in order to participate in a competitive fashion will deter the vast majority. For those that are lucky enough to not be hindered by those factors, TROYER will.. Few will justify spending tens of thousands of dollars to feel inadequate. For the sensible ones, their needs will be met at the club/backyard level with equipment they deem sensible as well..
A excellent post - leaving one thing out. How then, would you suggest we improve and grow the HFT community? Perhaps worthwhile to begin a different thread.
 
Now that brings up a very interesting question to ask those who play the game and those who limit them self's or don't play due to similar reasons .. ??????

I don't have the ability of my scope to parrilax range to the required to know distance.
I can't range well due to the limits of magnification in the Hunter class's
I don't really understand how to get accurate D.O.P.E. for my set up used to play the FT game etc etc etc .....

So if MD posts at each lane ACTUAL DISTANCE, then states KZ size there shooting at .... the first two gripes get pretty much covered IMO.
As to the third .... simply have folks during practice home or pre-match shoot at random known distances within 10-55 yards and have them write down whats the required correction ... With a MD posting distance to target, shoot it as in practice !!!! The size of the KZ tells you how sloppy of a job trying to get in the hole you can be :LOL:

NOW ... done as such, MANY of the reasons folks don't wish to invest in time or equipment in no longer an excuse. As the overall skills of the shooters increase, make the KZ's smaller or further away ... HIGHER TROYER value :oops:

The SKILL required does not change as technique, consistent shot set up, reading wind and having an accurate gun and pellet combo is STILL the task of any shooter to figure out !!
Yes yes yes …. Your thoughts are moving the discussion in the right direction
 
  • Like
Reactions: Motorhead
How then, would you suggest we improve and grow the HFT community? Perhaps worthwhile to begin a different thread.
You could title it "Opening a Massive Can of Worms"... lol

All joking aside i'd like to see Open be truly Open (like being able to use a bipod and sticks with whatever scope power you want). I think this would put a few people back into the Open class from Hunter (probably more than a few, in reality it would likely kill the Hunter class). How to not lose the Hunter class if this is done is the primary drawback to doing it...
 
You could title it "Opening a Massive Can of Worms"... lol

All joking aside i'd like to see Open be truly Open (like being able to use a bipod and sticks with whatever scope power you want). I think this would put a few people back into the Open class from Hunter (probably more than a few, in reality it would likely kill the Hunter class). How to not lose the Hunter class if this is done is the primary drawback to doing it...
Ya know Jim ....

Just doing it and letting the ebb and flow of like or dislike taking its natural course of conversation is actually a very low impact way to see ... The Cliche of "Build it and they will come" is not a half bad idea :love:
** Think I'll join you and do just this at our next club FT event ( State distances ) :sneaky:
 
A excellent post - leaving one thing out. How then, would you suggest we improve and grow the HFT community? Perhaps worthwhile to begin a different thread.
Thank you for that cavedweller!

How would I suggest we improve and grow FT and its different classes?

As someone who was recently given the opportunity to partake in helping organize an AAFTA-sanctioned GP, I'll take a stab at answering that question for those who care to put up with my poorly crafted ramblings.

Field Target isn't dying and infact I believe it is growing. There are too many talented and dedicated hardcore folks out there for the idea that the sport/activity/hobby will soon be dead to exist. Folks like, Yourself, Garret, JW & Mr Merritt, Leo Gonzalez, Matt Sawyer, Ron Jobbes, Al Padilla, Wayne Burns and the relentless unstoppable force that is Randy, Motorhead, Mr Piercy, to name a few.. and not to mention all the talented shooters that serve to inspire the rest of us that not long ago were contemplating, admiring, but simply watching them... Like the entire USA teams over the years, from Mr. Harold, to Mr. Suave and Mr. Cray, to now young Lauren, Cameron, and how about that Mr. Patner and Sir Hughes, huh!!

The main impediment I recognize and have alluded to already is Access. The folks are clearly there now, and there will always be guys waiting in the wings to join as long as access becomes more readily available. Here too, I must commend you, as I know that you've taken it upon yourself to tackle this same issue, based on private conversations we've both had.

Though our country is a vast swath of majestic landscapes, gaining access to even a small parcel of its beauty is seemingly impossible, given the high prices, regulations, and growing anti-sentiments that manage to be heard, with the simple strategy of being louder. The vast majority of us (I'll assume, given our shared interest) are quiet professionals working hard to make dreams happen. Time runs along fast and rapidly while the work to gather resources is undertaken, and the opportunities march on becoming more expensive. The antis simply shout, and more often than not, their voices are heard if for no other reason than to promote their silence.

Now, there are still places where FT can grow, due to not being as expensive, densely populated, and where the political climate aligns with not having so much oversight and constant regulation. Our local club was dealt a blow that threatened its existence at the hands of some of the things mentioned. Thankfully, for the old guard, this wasn't their first rodeo, and no amount of meddling deters their resolve... Further evidence that FT is alive and well, the sheer will to see it continue is testament once more to that vibrancy.

For folks like me who claim to love FT, there is much to be done to match the level of commitment and achievement the aforementioned have already accomplished in making FT available and appealing this far. What is left to do? What can individuals do? Commitment and Cohesion! Commit the resources to put a rig together, help someone else acquire a rig from the many sitting in our closets that we know we won't ever shoot again, commit to finding a club or a group of folks that share the same passion, commit to showing up, helping out, commit to buying/building the necessary things, commit to putting differences aside for the greater good (as a diagnosed ENTJ personality typle, this is my personal achilles heel), commit to doing it if you actually can...
Despite all the challenges one can encounter, one must find a way to carry on with the activity. We can't call it a discipline if we are not committed to it.

Money is the next impediment to growing FT. An uncomfortable subject for those living in a country where we all see ourselves as self-determined individuals capable of achievement. But the reality of Money is present more than ever. It is no mystery that the country is undergoing some radical challenges regarding all things related to money and the economy. COVID, inflation, and the natural cycles of governance have affected us all. Some, maybe less than others, but the effects have been felt, and the political climate has affected the animus and character of the American people, if not the world.. But hard times make for hard people, and hard people will always work to bring forth good times once more.. I'll bring it up again, now more than ever it is critical to evaluate just how much we are willing to tax our ownselves... The few FT capable guns that often come up, do so at retail or darn close to retail price, yes, even for used guns we are asking over MSRP... old styers going for the price of a brand new one... I try to price my stuff accordingly, and if someone that I know is serious about FT contacts me with true interest, I more often than not try to cut them a deal... recently, a steal of a deal!!!

Also, finding access to places to shoot, either by tapping into folks who own land in suitable places or convincing established places to make room for FT. The motto is, "if you build it, they will come". And came they did! I had the pleasure of shaking many a hand at the Western States GP 2025 and will forever be grateful to those who included me in it, and chipped in to make it happen, even if at times personalities didn't align, FT carried on for one more valuable event.

In my personal life, most of my resources dried out accidentally, and I've taken a major step back from my interests, but my personal resolve isn't to walk away, but to recover and find a way to do things better. Most of you have witnessed and adviced me through my frantic divestment of most of my collection in an effort to continue to be responsible at the home front, where it matters most, while making sure my wares were priced to promote others picking up FT. I've held on to a few rifles and, more importantly, the notion that there is much work to do, on me personally, and in the realm of Field Target....
 
Last edited:
Thank you for that cavedweller!

How would I suggest we improve and grow FT and its different classes?

As someone who was recently given the oportunity to partake in helping organize an AAFTA-sanctioned GP, I'll take a stab at answering that question for those that care to put up with my poorly crafted ramblings.

Field Target isn't dying and infact I believe it is growing. There are too many talented and dedicated hardcore folks out there for the idea that the sport/activity/hobby will soon be dead. Folks like, Yourself, Garret, JW & Mr Merritt, Leo Gonzalez, Matt Sawyer, Ron Jobbes, Al Padilla, Wayne Burns and the relentless unstoppable force that is Randy, Motorhead, Mr Piercy, to name a few.. and not to mention all the talented shooters that serve to inspire the rest of us that not long ago were contemplating, admiring, but simply watching them... Like the entire USA teams over the years; from Mr. Harold, to Mr. Suave and Mr. Cray to now young Lauren, Cameron, and how about that Mr. Patner and Sir Hughes, huh!!

The main impediment I recognize and have alluded to already is Access. The folks are clearly there now, and there will always be guys waiting in the wings to join as long as access becomes more readily available. Here too, I must commend you, as I know that you've taken it upon yourself to tackle this same issue, based on private conversations we've both had.

Though our country is a vast swath of majestic landscapes, gaining access to even a small parcel of its beauty is seemingly impossible given the high prices, regulations, and growing anti-sentiments that manage to be heard, with the simple strategy of being louder. The vast majority of us (I'll assume, given our shared interest) are quiet professionals working hard to make dreams happen. Time runs along fast and rapidly while the work to gather resources is undertaken, and the opportunities march on becoming more expensive. The antis simply shout, and more often than not, their voices are heard if for no other reason than to promote their silence.

Now, there are still places where FT can grow, due to not being as expensive, densely populated, and where the political climate aligns with not having so much oversight and constant regulation. Our local club was dealt a blow that threatened its existence at the hands of some of the things mentioned. Thankfully, for the old guard, this wasn't their first rodeo, and no amount of meddling deters their resolve... Further evidence that FT is alive and well, the shear will to see it continue is testament once more to that vibrancy.

For folks like me that claim to love FT, there is much to be done to match the level of commitment and achievement the aforementioned have already accomplished in making FT available and appealing this far. What is left to do? what can individuals do? Commitment and Cohesion! Commit the resources to put a rig together, help someone else acquire a rig from the many sitting in our closets that we know we won't ever shoot again, commit to finding a club or a group of folks that share the same passion, commit to showing up, helping out, commit to buying/building the necessary things, commit to putting differences aside for the greater good (as a diagnosed ENTJ personality typle, this is my personal achilles heel), commit to doing it if you actually can...
Despite all the challenges one can encounter, one must find a way to carry on with the activity. We can't call it a discipline if we are not committed to it.

Money is the next impediment to growing FT. An uncomfortable subject for those living in a country where we all see ourselves as self-determined individuals capable of achievement. But the reality of Money is present more than ever. It is no mystery that the country is undergoing some radical challenges regarding all things related to money and the economy. COVID, inflation, and the natural cycles of governance have affected us all. Some, maybe less than others, but the effects have been felt, and the political climate has affected the animus and character of the American people, if not the world.. But hard times make for hard people, and hard people will always work to bring forth good times once more.. I'll bring it up again, now more than ever it is critical to evaluate just how much we are willing to tax our ownselves... The few FT capable guns that often come up, do so at retail or darn closet to retail, yes, even for used guns we are asking over MSRP... old styers going for the price of a brand new one... I try to price my stuff accordingly, and if someone that I know is serious about FT contacts me with true interest, I more often than not try to cut them a deal... recently, a steal of a deal!!!

Also, finding access to places to shoot, either by tapping into folks who own land in suitable places or convincing established places to make room for FT. The motto is, "if you build it, they will come". And came they did! I had the pleasure of shaking many a hand at the Western States GP 2025 and will forever be grateful to those who included me in it, and chipped in to make it happen, even it at times personalities didn't align, FT carried on for one more valuable event.

In my personal life, most of my resources dried out accidentally, and I've taken a major step back from my interests, but my personal resolve isn't to walk away, but to recover and find a way to do things better. Most of you have witnessed and adviced me through my frantic divestment of most of my collection in an effort to continue to beresponsible at the home front where it matters most, while making sure my wares were priced to promote others picking up FT. I've held on to a few rifles and, more importantly, the notion that there is much work to do, on me personally, and in the realm of Field Target....
🎯
 
  • Like
Reactions: .SevenSeven