Well if you want, run four or five shot groups and I’ll make an aggregate group in SubMOA for it. I’m curious how someone else’s .22 HW does.Maybe i will try my HW77 long .22 today , my .22 springer . Also a Webley tap load .22
Now that’s a really accurate rifle! Nice shooting! I didn’t do the whole card, but I did enough to see the result. I did assume the card had 1” squares. Correct me if I’m wrong.just shot HW77 long .22 only 48 yards 6 to 16 MPH winds from East and up hill EDIT: Top left is first shot , bottom left is last shot , it figures right ! View attachment 558688
yes one inch , so the center orange is 3/8 , maybe tomorrow AM the wind will not be as constant .Now that’s a really accurate rifle! Nice shooting! I didn’t do the whole card, but I did enough to see the result. I did assume the card had 1” squares. Correct me if I’m wrong.
View attachment 558704
Yes that is one a one inch bullseye.Went ahead and dropped that low shot. It doubles the group size, and seemed really out of place. I also assumed the red bull here was 1”.
Honestly that’s a great card considering they’re really lobbing in at 75.
View attachment 558706
Yes that is one a one inch bullseye.
A good comparison is to look at this group I shot the same day with the 97 .20 cal at 75-yard.
View attachment 558953
Good morning, EqDelta
Morning, Trampas,I shoot a 97K .22 with a Vortek kit. I shoot shotgun shells consistently at 65 yds. Best shooting springer I own. I’m shooting the H&Ns 14.66 gr 5.53 head I believe.
View attachment 559025
Paper removes the BS factors. I thought I was a real hero hitting shotgun hulls on the berm behind the 100 yard targets with a 22LR. At 100yds it was lucky to group 3". I wasn't hitting the hulls as much as was bouncing them around with the bullet's sand splash. It was lots of fun and made me feel great until I checked my actual accuracy on paper.Morning, Trampas,
I do the same, but not on paper. It seems like it easier to focus in on a plinking target, or more likley selective memory.