Air Arms Utah Airguns Pyramyd AIR FX Airguns Daystate Diana Airgun Depot Edgun West DonnyFL: PCP Air Rifle Shop and Airgun Moderators The Pellet Shop Airforce Airguns
Saber Tactical Optisan Side-Shot Scope Cam NE Airguns Baker Airguns AGS Topgun Airguns Predator International Huben Airguns Huma-Air Shooting Supplies Hurricane Luftvapen AEA Precision Airguns H&N Impulse Air ZAN Projectiles Hawke Optics Stud Mag Loader RX Target Systems Sports Match Scope Mounts Altaros Banner CTA Thomas Air Hatsan USA Georgia Air Guns Skout Airguns Nielsen Specialty Ammo Patch Worm Weihrauch Sport Talon Tunes Airgun-Revisions JTS ST7 PPP RTI AirStryk Industries Macavity Arms Vector Optics Corbin

What are your thoughts on lead exposure?

I got this from a toxicologist:

Much of the information out there about lead poisoning is nothing more than alarmist science. I work in a toxicology lab and am always amazed at the bad rap that lead gets. Let's look at a few things:

- The lead in lead paint is in the form of organic lead and lead salts, NOT METALLIC LEAD. Both organic lead and lead salts are easily absorbed if you eat something contaminated with it or put your fingers in your mouth after handling something contaminated with it.

- Lead poisoning of waterfowl after eating the metallic lead. This is actually true and why I think so many folks are so scared of metallic lead. But there is a big difference between waterfowl and humans. Waterfowl have gizzards. The lead shot that the bird eats gets trapped in the gizard and very slowly erodes, is converted into bioavailable lead salts thanks to digestive acids, and is absorbed into the circulation. This can only occur because the lead shot gets stuck in the gizzard and is continuously ground releasing microscopic lead particles into the digestive tract.

Humans do not have a gizzard and thus a lead pellet and other metallic lead will pass thru quickly and no harm will come of it.

- But I know PB enthusiasts that have suffered lead poisoning from handling lead bullets. No you don't. The biggest problem that PB enthusiasts have with lead is from the propellant. When the propellant burns it gives off vapors of lead salts (again, not metallic lead). These lead salts are dangerous and why you should not routinely shoot a PB indoors, except in a very well ventilated range.

- What about lead dust? What if you inhale lead dust?

Have you ever seen lead dust? I bet you really haven't. It is still lead and no matter how fine a dust particle it is ground in to, it is still many, many, many, many, many times heavier than air and immediately falls to the floor. Now I'm sure that you could devise a way to inhale lead dust, but it would need to be intentionally done.

- What about that black stuff I get on my fingers after handling CPL and CPH pellets. That stuff is not lead (IIRC it is actually graphite) and even if it was lead your body has no easy way of absorbing metallic lead.

- Lead vapors, what about lead vapors? I heard they are extremely toxic. And if we are melting lead to cast our own pellets, or bullets, or fishing sinkers, then we will die.

No you won't, unless you have a really, really hot smelting furnace. Lead melts at 328 Celsius (622 F) but doesn't vaporize until around 1,700 Celsius (3,092 F). Now should you actually reach the vaporization temperature, you will have a problem.

I could go on, but will stop at this point.
I collect old pellet tins and boxes. It's not unusual to find quite a bit of dust in the bottom of the containers, which will get airborne like talcum powder when disturbed. I started wearing a mask when cleaning the pellets because I wasn't sure exactly what the grayish dust is. Always assumed lead powder.

Optical zero

I dialed my Hawke adjustable zoom scope to "optical zero" then reattached it to the rifle and was disappointed to see that the scope was way off. So, I adjusted the scope to print where I wanted the bullet to go, but in the end, both elevation and windage were almost at their extreme limits as before.
Am I doing this wrong?

At what distance are you zeroing? That can make a difference when adjusting elevation, of course. And it depends on the scope specs.

For example, for long distance rifle rigs, the scope mounts may need to have some angulation built in. Otherwise, the scope runs out of elevation adjustment. My Ruger Precision Rifle in 6.5 Creedmoor uses mounts with 20 MOA angulation built into them. That allows me to dial in for longer distances, but would max out the turret at shorter distances.

But you also mentioned that your WINDAGE is maxed out. Now that's strange.

So, assuming it's not the shooter and you're zeroing with the rifle stabilized... something is wrong with... the scope, the gun, or the scope mounts. Which is the most likely of those three things?

I agree with the other comments.... the scope mounts are the most likely culprit. Perhaps the mounts are cheap / out of spec. Or perhaps it's the mountING. Something got wonky in the mounting process. Maybe try RE-mounting the scope. Did you do it properly? Torqued (with a torque driver or wrench) the screws gradually / incrementally in a "criss-cross-pattern?"

Is the scope mount a one-piece? Or two pieces?
  • Like
Reactions: Normkel

Old school FWB 124 surprise

Zero expectations. Then this happened.



View attachment 94354

View attachment 94367

View attachment 94377View attachment 94393View attachment 94406View attachment 94420View attachment 94426View attachment 94436View attachment 94445View attachment 94454View attachment 94468View attachment 94478View attachment 94496View attachment 94506View attachment 94529View attachment 94551View attachment 94571



Beautiful and stunning Walnut beaver tail stock with the original multi-coat epoxy gloss finish, mint action (mesmerizing bore🤓), original manual, original invoice from Robert Law's Air Rifle Headquarters, test targets shot by Mr. Law while owner was present in the establishment, spare parts: sling swivels and trigger shoe look new (haven't removed them from packing yet), washers, front sight post inserts, breech seal. Not in photos is a 124 beech stock which came with the ensemble.

What's not to be happy about?
WOW what a find !

Air Arms  too heavy

TX's use very minimal spring preload, as such shooting an overly heavy pellet will likely create piston bounce as the compression of air and required energy to get a heavy pellet into motion will have piston likely bouncing / rebounding off this compression spike during the pellets launch time.

You will feel it become weird in the cyclic action when discharged feeling non typical.
How do you determine this, and how would you measure it.

Optical zero

Optical zero and the Mechanical zero of any decent scope shall be very close. And this what I accept only.

I even managed to dual purpose my X50 target scope (with 20MOA single piece mount) between my Impact variant shooting 50-100 Meters and my f-class W308 shooting 100-500 Meters. .... Not more then 3-4 clicks L-R when swapping the scope between the guns.

Any misalignment error may come from cheap rings or the picatinny/NATO rail attached to your rifle.
  • Like
Reactions: Normkel

Steyr  Steyr Hunting 5A

Not exactly new is it.
That being said though i guess most have never seen the innards of these things and as evolution of our dear pcp´s push on.. Well let´s just say the 5A is limited in todays market.

8.jpg


10.jpg


This then a 22 flavor. The Steyr is no doubt a top tier gun and spoiler alert.. it shows. From a pure design point of view there´s in my mind absolutely nothing to come down on. In true German fashion (although Austrian but from this respect, same same really) it´s designed and made 100% sans any flaws. It really is that simple.

1.jpg


No. Barrel is not threaded and i believe Steyr offered a similar collar setup to be able to install a moderator. Ie; a 1/2"-20 UNF thread out front. No matter, i made my own from steel and brass thinking it might be a nice blend for the rifle. Thing is set with an o-ring within and is in turn held in by 3pcs of M4 allen stop screw, thereby being able to be adjusted for linearity vs the barrel (zero runout on the moderator).

2.jpg


In contrast to most pcp´s the amount of machining going into this piece isn´t to shake a stick at. In essence the machining needed has been been regarded as such that a minimum of parts to a degree and in turn on three given "lines" on the main receiver.
In pic the valve assy, as you can see out of stainless steel. The poppet on a 1.5mm shank with an aluminium hat that has an o-ring set into it. The bearing surface on the actual valve housing is a tad limited but this is again catered to in that the "top hat" there (which is part of the anti bounce system) holds the end of the poppet shank and that top hat is set with minimal clearance vs the valve housing.
Note the a´la Hatsan multiple exhaust ports, which in turn are rather large seeing the caliber.

3.jpg


These are offered in an array of power levels. From the German "frei" 7,5J and upwards, ending in 40J/29,5fpe. Transfer port carries an end plug that´s a M6 allen stop screw and as M6 is threaded on a 5mm dia hole it stands to reason that the transfer port is on that, 5mm dia.
Power is adjusted by an allen stop screw that sports a through hole and this through hole is what varies power output. The transfer channel is the sealed off by yet an allen stop screw, sealed with Loctite.
That being said then if you remove the "power insert" what sets the limit on these units is twofold. First up the valve seat is on a mere 4,3mm and in turn - if my calculations are on the money - approx 17cc´s of plenum volume.
In other words to make a Hunting 5A reach more modern levels these are the two things to adress.

4.jpg


Poppet return spring is a rather stiff proposition. In turn it at one end sits on that plastic guide rod, and this rod runs the length of the plenum volume. Note the green colored o-rings used through out, these are harder than the regular Buna 70 ones we encounter, why i presume they´re 90s.?

5.jpg


The mags. Might look a bit peculiar but nor is the setup new by any measure and nor is it especially stupid. So called "harmonica" mags were at one time all the rage back in the later 1800´s and i guess Steyr took it from there.
These fit into a mag well, of course, and the fitting of them is minute to say the least. However, end shake is really set by how you install the barrel, as that pushes directly on them. In short end shake is "variable" , as it were.
This particular gun i picked up used and as i got to try it out with a moderator out front it soon enough became evident that she leaks at the rear of the mag well setup, so need to adress that.
I know from previous that when stunts like this are pulled the actual "leak" induced by the clearance between the mag and the mag well they can be set REAL tight and thus the setup become real silent too - spite that clearance.

6.jpg


Hammer then. A very short very light offering. If memory serves on a mere 21 grams? (will have to double check that figure). Hammer rides on two "rods" running the outside of the receiver, which brings that the hammer can´t really but run in a very linear fashion. Small spring in turn, part of the anti bounce as you can figure.
Rods are screwed to the hammer on two points for each side.

7.jpg


"German efficiency". Indeed. That there is the regulator and the tube/tank threads directly to it. By altering the belleville washers within base regulator pressure is varied at will. In turn that small screw ya see there is where each setting can be dialed.
On that note i find it a bit peculiar there´s no reg pressure gauge really.? Dunno why that is, these days there certainly would be one present. (Gun was made in 2018 btw)

So.
What gives?
Well. As the opportunity presented itself with this semi i thought it´d be a neat gun to use on the rats. That´s mainly what i keep all my pcp´s for so, yeah. This brings that the piece will see a rather elaborate moderator out front, noone appreciates a high note airgun.
Still compact, REAL compact even (this is the shorter Scout model) and as such.. Would 40J suffice for the task at hand? I guess, but why risk it really as i´m then and again presented with shots that can extend a bit.
Thus i will make power jump a tad on this unit. Nope. No fire breather by any measure, just jump.

It has been claimed that these ain´t "slug guns" and be that as it may nor is THAT a first either. As i checked 30 grain pills fit the mags no issue, it miiiiight be there´s room in there for a 32. Dunno as of this writing.

This being said the Hunting 5 has become slightly of age, and i guess it shows. To cope with customer demands i have a real hard time seeing how anyone would pick a 40J stonewall pcp up today, and especially at the hang tag these one carries.
In essence, to large degree, it was put into market together with other similar guns, like the BSA R-10 and what not.

38.jpg


Yeah well, one of them came through my hands as well, again a puff claimed not to cater to slugs. This then an "export" version. Well, hogwash. It toss´s slugs like noones business and does so the north side of 1000+fps all day. Yes, it now sports a stand alone plenum. Very very accurate with slugs and an absolute delight to use.

PCP Rifle  NLA FX Wildcat MK3 BT 600 mm in both .25 and .30 Reduced !

EDIT : I STILL HAVE IT. MONITORING IT FOR A VERY SLOW LEAK. SO PULLING IT FOR NOW



I have an excellent condition wildcat BT. Shoots great and holds air great. Has a 420cc carbon bottle, 25 mm Sekhmet digital gauge and saber bottle clamp. Also comes with complete setups for .25 caliber and .30 both 600 mm. Minor blemish in the 25 caliber shroud pictured. Small ding. Only ding in the gun. I have 3 QD Fox 25 cal mags and one stock FX 30 mag to go with it. Scope not included. Looking for 1100 shipped. Reduced



IMG_1959.jpeg
IMG_1961.jpeg
IMG_1960.jpeg


IMG_1962.jpeg


IMG_1964.jpeg


IMG_1963.jpeg

IMG_1966.jpeg

IMG_1967.jpeg

IMG_1968.jpeg

N/A  What did you name your airgun

Dont really name them but ive called them a few choice words .. like why you dirty 🤬... 😊
I think I've heard them call me a few choice words as well. One of them even accused me of making it look bad.

FX  DRS Tactical Selector/Safety

Long/short could someone at FX consider manufacturing a selector for the DRS Tactical that operates as the AR-15 platform it is patterned after? I bought one of these and like it but having decades of experience with the M16/AR-15 platform I can say the reversed configuration on the DRS Tactical is problematic for those of us who have the “muscle memory” ingrained into us. This has personally caused me some issues when shooting the rifle and I have to take extra care to remind myself “safe” isn’t safe on this thing. At least with my Impact M3 I was able to buy an M2 selector to swap out but I haven’t seen an equivalent for the DRS.

Filter