HW30 Galling
- By MDriskill
- Traditional Airguns
- 36 Replies
I don't know yet, but it's a very stout piece of stuff. It's been in an old HW 50 for years with no issues.How many rounds can you put through it before you swap in a new piece.
Upvote 0
I don't know yet, but it's a very stout piece of stuff. It's been in an old HW 50 for years with no issues.How many rounds can you put through it before you swap in a new piece.
Nice Target!!100 yd bench centers on 11"x14"View attachment 582058
I wish I would have started there instead of the Beeman Cheif2, and Gauntlet2. I wound up pulling out the cash and got an FX Crown.bs to all that stuff,until you know what you really want to do , just get a good simple gun that has much good reports and good reviews.do not need all that stuff when starting out.Hand pumping is easy if the air gun does not nee to go pass 3000psi.....it also depends how much money you want to spend .you better off with Benjamin PCP FOR THE MONEY....
Take it easy friend. Deep breath. Yeah, I understand it all. Just questioning the order of the bleed valve releases.GX video showed them draining the lower bleed valve of the filter first then the upper, with the compressor bleed valve last. Thats why I asked. But I’ll follow the friendly advice from the gentlemen that answered me above. Carry on.Do you understand how this filter works and how youll get a yes and a no to this answer?
Maybe you should plan on a shooting partnership?Try this next
View attachment 581475
Or
View attachment 581477
And don't let it go to this ..
View attachment 581476
PCP is more enjoyable?Accuracy with a springer takes a lot of practice, especially with hold. With PCP's it's usually on the shooter for pin point accuracy. If your budget allows, I would go the PCP route, much more enjoyable shooting and accuracy wise as well as a more quiet report with a moderator.
Because what a guy does to win a competition with a barrel is not what most guys want to endure. A barrel that‘s comprised of many parts is just not a good idea when you want consistency day to day, month to month and year to year under all conditions. Solid barrels have no parts and can be used as an integral part of the chassis.
I’ve had dozens of rifles shipped over the last 6 years. Never had an issue. These last 2 were nothing but a problem. Crowshipping worldwide sucks the stories in the states are the same
getting anything out of Germany is a wait and wait some more DHL Germany is a joke
now in the states we have all these fly by night delivery companies i consider them Ubers with packages but they lack one big thing they can't find addresses
well, the rifle is a treat
Yes same guy. He said there’s nothing wrong with the guns. They’re switching to PCP. CrowI remember seeing those rifles up for sale a few months ago. I managed to fight the urge to hit the buy now. Glad they found a good home. . Those 210’s sure are pretty.
Sorry for the confusion. If you are only buying one rifle and FT is just one of several things you want to do with it (pesting, hunting, etc) then maybe a .22 is better. If FT is the most important and the other things are not as important, then get a .177.Thank you Greg. Question, if you have been successful with 0.177 why are you recommending .22?
IMO, i think the harmonics term, or thing, is very misunderstood and an overused marketing cliche or term used to sell "stuff". Dampening barrel vibration (or whip) at the muzzle end can be accomplished many ways, but it can be neutralized (or most of it) where it begins, by improving barrel quality and breech / action interface. Heck just adding a 1/4" or taking away a 1/4" can have a dramatic affect on whip; you can even add thick O-rings along a barrel at specific increments to absorb vibration. Think of how a rope or whips tip / end will fray when you snap it, the cheaper the weave the faster it shreds. I like FX guns... don't own any anymore but that's because of # of overall parts and o-rings etc... I like simple as in less is more.Yeah I get that part but their barrels are legit. Doesn't matter about the thickness their barrels win a lot of competitions. I would say try and thicken it for harmonics.
I have had a cheap one in the past; it's like night and day cheap VS Harris. I have a better ideaBack when they first came out with it, I heard negative reviews of the Magpul bipods. I don't recall what the problems were. But I decided I would not get one.
I've always been happy with my Harris bipods. Never a problem.
Not related other than it's Magpul... back when they came out with Magpul Glock magazines, I bought five of them for my Glock 19. They were about $5 cheaper than factory Glock mags. Mind you.... I had plenty of mags, but I thought I'd give these a try and use them at the range. Hoo-boy. Every single one of the five Magpul Glock mags I bought turned my otherwise INFALLIBLE Gen 2 Glock 19 into a jam-o-matic. Multiple failures to feed on a single full load of the magazine. And it was all five of them. For what it's worth!![]()
I'm not him, but it seems like he clearly qualified that recommendation with "if you are only getting 1 gun and need it to do field target AND hunting".Thank you Greg. Question, if you have been successful with 0.177 why are you recommending .22?
Apologies for bringing up an oldie, but a great ttuning thread imo.
I have a thought for conversation...,My .22 zelos likes 870 fps for the 18.13 pellets. I have gotten there bumping up the reg, and backing off he h.s., and vice versa with the same group sizes. What are your thoughts.
My set up with...
1. Higher reg psi, and less hammer spring feels ,and sounds sluggish compared to...
2. Lower reg. and up the hammer spring? Seems snappiier, and quiet.
let's leave shot count, sd and es at the proverbial door for now. I am more interested in finding if your rig groups better with a higher reg.?, or more H.S. Tension to get to the same fps?
Thanks for your ideas....
Gerry