GoPro Hero4 as a scope cam

Well, to be honest, GoPro Hero is not a best option for a scope cam.

There are three strong reasons to support that:

1 - there is no zoom
2 - you can't adjust the focus
​3 - 1.5" display (if there even is one) is too small for any serious hunting/pest control because it's hard to see anything precisely

​But, there are also three big pluses for GoPro Hero:

​1 - it records audio @ 240 FPS
2 - it records 240 FPS at 720p resolution
​3 - it records @ 240 FPS indefinitely

​Still, one has to deal with three problems first to get a useable scope cam

​1 - I have found that a cheap 2x telephoto lens with an adapter is good enough to get a decent size picture into the frame
​2 - Well you can't beat that one, but, GoPro has a fixed focus from about 12" to infinity so with a 2x telephoto lens it should have most scope's reticules in more or less sharp focus
3 - I don't really take this one too much into account since airgun hunting/pest control is forbidden by law in my country but, the screen provided is good enough for most plinking sessions and, you can always use a FPV setup and view the picture on a bigger screen you usually use for FPV (if you are into FPV using quad/hexa/octa copters or other RC flying machines). Note that you can't use a GoPro app on your smart phone or on your laptop/tablet because there is no live stream when using 240 FPS

​I did have Casio Exilim ZR1000 but videos were worse in quality (high speed engine that Casio uses haven't changed in more than a decade!) and there is no audio @ 240 FPS. 480 or 1000 FPS are useless options because video quality is so low.

​Sony RX100 MK4 records at much higher resolutions at much higher FPS but it can only record for 2-3 seconds which is just too short for my use and it costs 2x as a GoPro

​In this day and age, if you don't have any of the three cameras mentioned above, my best bet would be iPhone 6 or Samsung S7 because both can record @240 FPS with audio, have adjustable focus and zoom and have 5" - 6" displays. Choosing between those two, my money would probably go to Samsung

​Here is one of the videos I've made with my GoPro Hero4:

 
​more can be found on my YouTube channel.
 
Very clear video, even after YouTube compressing it. Gopro is the way forward for 240fps videos. Plz do post pics of your mounting gear. Also, are you able to test this in low light/night with infra red light?

Another option for those wanting to record 2k videos (however lower quality VGA 240fps) is SJCAM5000+ that's a decent sports camera. Around $100. SJCAM5000X Elite however has 2" screen versus 1.5" on the + model. M20 is also an interesting option.
 
Hi, guys!

The problem of video recording through the scope is very familiar to me. I've used Casio exilim for several years to make my videos, but it is not convenient to record video in this way, because you can not shoot as you normally do - the holding of your gun is very different.

I'm fan of extremely far (50 - 120 meters is normal) and accurate (4cm (1,5") shooting with my PCP, that's why I'm sure that there is no trifles in shooting.

I've searched through the market and could not find any affordable devices with good enough characteristics as for me. That’s why I had to invent my RusBear's ScopeCam. I've tested it in different conditions and situations: winter (-10c (14F) and snow, Autumn and rain, Summer heat, Airgun Varmint competitions and hunting. Now I can say for sure, that I'm, as a very exigent shooter, satisfied with my invention and it is 3 times cheaper than GoPro Eagle Eye (does not include camera itself) and in RusBear’s ScopeCam camera itself is included in the package!

RusBear's ScopeCam allows you to shoot as you normally do and record very good quality video: 720p 200fps, 1080p 120fps, 2K 60fps and 4K 30 fps.

Here you can find some examples of videorecording with RusBear's ScopeCam and full review:

720p 200 fps:


1080p 120fps:


Full review:


With best wishes,
Nikolay.
 
Hello guys!

I like many others in the industry have been in the scope cam game for a long time and the one thing that I have learned more than anything else is resolution and frame rate are key to good quality video capturing. There are two types of scope camera setups. There are units that you use like viewing a monitor on a CCTV system and those that allow you to shoulder and fire the weapon exactly like you would without a scope capture device.

It is my opinion that unless the shooter is using the scope camera to see light beyond that of the human eye (infrared) as in night vision, the CCTV setup forces the shooter to aim the rifle almost like a camera and less like a rifle. The scope is typically mounted way forward in an attempt to allow the shooter to somewhat shoulder the weapon while still being able to focus on the screen of the monitor.

The through the scope versions split the image sending one side of the split and sent to the camera which is typically 90° to the scopes image path and the other image is sent to the shooter's eye almost as if there is nothing additional between the shooter's eye and the scope glass. This offers far more shooter feedback for reviewing trigger squeezing, breathing, confirmation to windage guestimating and so much more.

When it comes to photography, the faster the frame rate the more light is required, So while it is possible to capture pellets in flight at 60 frames per second (FPS), the lighting must be absolutely perfect. On the flip side of this conversation is 240 FPS which requires a lot more light to capture all those images.

So if a person is on the quest for scope camera capture to watch the pellet in flight they will be chasing the FPS rabbit whereas the person that simply wants to capture the overall moment without necessarily seeing the pellet in flight, will be chasing the resolution rabbit.

The sports camera is the best video capture device for this type of work. It's compact, rugged, offers multiple resolutions, the ability to change lenses, and is devoted to video capture only. When we look at action cameras that offer the highest resolution coupled with the highest frame rate, no one beats GoPro.

Sure you can something that offers 200FPS but it will be at 720p resolution (grainy, fuzzy images) or it will deliver clearer images but at the cost of less frames per second capture.

As for the magnification of the image, you simply use the properly sized lens for the resolution and all is well. I have demonstrated in videos years ago that cell phones just do not offer the same level of video clarity as they are far more susceptible to vibrations and harmonics due to their substantially large surface area.

In closing, I am not saying for one moment that a person cannot use a cell phone and use some attachment method to capture decent scope cam footage, I am simply adding commentary to the topic "GoPro Hero4 as a scope cam" and saying, yep, it certainly is one of the best vehicles to use to catch either of those rabbits I talked about earlier.