Benjamin Trail NP XL or Gamo Magnum in 22

For about two years I have owned the Benjamin Trail NP XL. A few weeks ago I bought a Gamo Magnum. Both air rifles are in 22 cal. Which do you think performs better? Im sure there are others out there that would like to know. I tried 8 types of amo, from 15 gr to 28 gr and used a chony to measure the velocity. I also did group test with all the amo from a distance of 27 yards. I also used a sound meter to record actual real life dB levels. I calculate standard deviation and velocity spreads as well as hitting energy of each airgun. Are you interested in seeing the results. I know I would be, but you tell me and I will upload more pictures and an an excel chart with all the test results. Let me know if this is of interest.
 
Ok then I will do just that.

The chart below is self explanatory. I will post the numbers and we can discuss the results. The gist of it is that both air rifles are definitely good quality and worth buying. You will not be disappointed with either one.

The Benjamin is heavier and longer than the Gamo. The Benjamin likes heavier pallets than the Gamo. However the Gamo can shoot lighter pellets a little faster to achieve similar energy numbers.

The Gamo is louder than the Benjamin. The Gamo is a mothe@#$%^&* to cock, where the Benjamin is much easier to cock. Then again the Gamo is a little more powerful. 

Kep in mind that the Benjamin has spit though about 4000 pellets, where the Gamo has only eaten about 300. With that said the Gamo has loosen up a bit even this early in the game. I remember the Benjamin was a lot tighter when I first bought it, but not as hard as the Gamo. I assume that the Gamo will get even better with time as well as I expect the velocity shown in the chart below to increase up to 20% as it brakes-in even more as I use it with time. Certainly a tuning could expedite the process. 

With that said the Gamo has really impressed me with its out of the box accuracy, something I did not have in the beginning with the Benjamin, it came later after brake in and lots of cleaning the barrel. Now the Benjamin is very accurate as well. With that said both rifles are hold sensitive,but it seems to me that the Gamo is not as picky as the Benjamin in terms of exact hold placement of my hand. The range of where I place my left hand, when I use the artillery position is not as critical as with the Benjamin. I have a mark on both rifles where I place my thumb and pinky on the rifle just to make sure that I maintain consistency in my hold.

The scope on the Benjamin after 300 shots it disintegrated. So I replaced it with a Leapers which lasted about 500 rounds, then a UTG which held very well and still have. However I wanted a better glass with the scope so I mounted an Athlon Talos BTR FFP and I love it. 

The Gamo I am still shooting with the stock scope that came with it. It seems to be holding up fine so far, but the reticle does not have mil dots, just a plane Jane. So I will probably go with a UTG or another Athlon scope ( really like the Athlons and seem to take the air gun beating well). The Gamo scope is finicky with holding zero you have to reset if a few times, but once it is set do not move it and leave it there, otherwise you will be chasing your zero and missing shots. Do not expect much from the stock Gamo scope, but once you set it will do its job reasonably well from 10 yards to about 30 yards, after that you will have to guesstimate the hold over as you do not want to mess with the turrets because you will be screwed. So buy another scope for the Gamo if you expect more. 

The Gamo is easier to carry around as it is lighter due to the composite stock. I like that it is lighter as it is practical, but it feels cheap to me in comparison to the Benjamin stock which is of great quality wood, but you pay the penalty of weight. 

So with that, enjoy the chart below and feel free to fire away any questions you might have. 

 
To me the Benjamin quality is really good, but it is heavy. If you do bench rest shooting you will be fine, but if you will be caring it in the woods it gets old and annoying. The Benjamin has an incorporated sling mount right under the barrel. The Gamo does not. 

The Gamo weighs about 8 lbs and the Benjamin about 12 lbs with the scope. The Benjamin seems smoother because it is heavier. The Gamo is forceful and you feel it in terms of vibrations when you pull the trigger, but it works well. Over time it should smooth out though. 

The Benjamin trigger is horrible, and I mean just that. One of the reasons as to why the accuracy was bad in the beginning for me. I replaced the trigger with the Charlie da Tuna one which was a huge improvement, but I did not like the fact that this trigger is a bit smaller than the stock one so it does not work well with my trigger finger. Eventually I went back to the original which is bigger, and did the bearing modification, polished the trigger, and drilled and taped a second stage hex bold on the trigger. Now I am extremely happy with the trigger.

The Gamo has a better and predictable trigger when both in stock condition.
 
So to avoid confusions, the accuracy test was done at 27 yards which I verified with a tape measure. The shooting was done using a bench rest with sand bags.

Both air rifles are accurate enough for me. The Benjamin produced a 5 shot group of 0.5" and the Gamo produced at the same distance a 5 shot group of 0.4". The 0.1" difference was probably me breathing the wrong way...

Below is the Gamo shooting. The top left using Diablo Exact is the 0.4" group



Below is the Benjamin shooting. The top right using JSB Diablo Jumbo Heavy is the 0.5" Group