Atlas 5-H vs. Accu-tac FC-5

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Terymc,
I don't own any Accu-tac's. The one in the video was one I borrowed for about a month. But, I'd be happy to review the SR-5 if someone sent me one. One thing I forgot to mention is that the SR-5 does not have the wide top area like the FC-5 and Atlas. So, it probably has a smaller base footprint. 
I saw a few notable names at EBR using the Accu-tac system with success. When I'm on bench I almost never have a need for panning (not even for speed silo). 
I'm an Atlas fan (even though they cost so much). I think you would be happy with either one. Check out the rest of the Accu-tac lineup. There might be a model that's adequate for your shooting style that would save you $. 
Tom
 
Upvote 0
Thanks Tom,
I am leaning toward the AccuTac at the moment. No Tilt is not a big deal for me from the bench and saves checking the level and readjusting the tilt.
It looks to be a direct competitor for the BT46-LW17.

my only concern was panning, but I did not think the small movements would create an issue. But constantly readjusting the legs would be a time consuming issue in a match if it was.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Resources
Menu