Let me start by saying: I am a Crosman fan, perhaps even one of their biggest fan-boys. That said, I wish they would get their act together when it comes to the QC on their barrels. I've ordered two .22 barrels for a Benjamin Trail within the last year or so, and both seem to have the same problems: the breech face is cut at the wrong angle creating severe (as in obvious to the naked eye, gun looks like a boomerang) barrel droop. Secondly, both barrels have less than good crowns. I have only re crowned the first one, so far. The second looks even, if a little rough, so I'm going to accuracy test it before re crowning...though I am not optimistic. Lastly, both barrels are "loose" (one more than the other). When pushing a pellet through by hand, I only really feel positive engagement with the rifling on the first third or so of the barrel length. The second third is vague/loose, and the pellet will actually just drop the last third with zero resistance until it hits the choked muzzle and stops. My first barrel won't shoot a group any tighter than an inch and a half at thirty yards (and rarely that tight), no matter how well I'm shooting that day, or which pellet I'm shooting. I haven't accuracy tested the second barrel yet, but as mentioned, I am not optimistic.
In contrast, I ordered a .177 Trail Barrel when I ordered the first .22. The .177 needed to be re crowned, but otherwise nearly stacks pellets at thirty yards. I also have a Vantage NP barrel in .177. This Trail loves both of the .177 barrels, and shoots extremely tight groups with either. Put on the (first) .22 barrel, and it's "shotgun city." What gives, Crosman?
In contrast, I ordered a .177 Trail Barrel when I ordered the first .22. The .177 needed to be re crowned, but otherwise nearly stacks pellets at thirty yards. I also have a Vantage NP barrel in .177. This Trail loves both of the .177 barrels, and shoots extremely tight groups with either. Put on the (first) .22 barrel, and it's "shotgun city." What gives, Crosman?